Filippo Mazzola vs Jeremy Gschwendtner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Gschwendtner has excelled in second serve performance, winning 47.23% of points compared to Mazzola's 39.5%. Could this be a decisive factor? Possibly, as it's known to correlate highly with match outcomes.
• When returning serves, Mazzola has an edge, winning 52.31% of points on opponents' second serves versus Gschwendtner's 45.85%. Is Mazzola's return game superior? The stats suggest so, especially in second serve returns.
• Both players have similar performance in returning first serves, with Mazzola slightly leading at 34.25% to Gschwendtner's 32.57%.
• Under pressure, Gschwendtner saves more breakpoints (53.89%) than Mazzola (47.86%). Could this resilience under pressure tilt the scales? It often does in tight matches.
• Gschwendtner enjoys a higher annual match win rate of 63.16% compared to Mazzola's 53.45%, highlighting a consistent performance advantage.
• Gschwendtner thrives on clay surfaces with a 59% win rate, while Mazzola's preferred surface is hard courts, where they win 62% of the time. How much will surface type influence the outcome?
• When it comes to tournament level, Gschwendtner holds an advantage at 64.29% match wins on Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, compared to Mazzola's 53.45%.
• Gschwendtner has faced lower-ranked opponents on average (195.6) than Mazzola (157.98), which might factor into the overall performance figures.
• Gschwendtner has the upper hand in deciding sets, winning 54% compared to Mazzola's 31%, a key consideration for potential three-set matches.
• When converting breakpoints, Gschwendtner achieves 35.45% success, slightly higher than Mazzola's 33.66% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):

Gschwendtner has consistently demonstrated a stronger second serve performance over the recent months, an aspect that often plays a critical role in the outcome of matches. Additionally, their ability to save breakpoints and convert them more effectively gives them an edge in pressure situations.

Conversely, Mazzola's strength in return games, particularly against second serves, could offset some of Gschwendtner's serving advantages. However, when the match reaches a deciding set, Gschwendtner appears more adept with a higher win percentage in those scenarios.

Taking into account surface preferences, Gschwendtner may find a strategic advantage on clay, the opposite of Mazzola's preference for hard courts. Overall match consistency and performance against similar-ranked players further tilt the prediction towards Gschwendtner.

Based on these considerations, Gschwendtner is the most likely candidate to win this upcoming tennis match.